Growth

Release Notes Template

A release notes template that works for both internal engineering changelogs and customer-facing product updates. Covers version, highlights, new features, improvements, bug fixes, and deprecations. Free to copy, download, and use. No signup required.

Template
# Release Notes

---

## Version [X.Y.Z] — [Date]

> **One-line summary:** [The most important thing in this release in plain English]

---

### ✨ New Features

#### [Feature Name]
[2–3 sentences describing what it does and why it matters to the user. Avoid technical jargon. Focus on the user benefit, not the implementation.]

**How to access:** [Settings → X, or "available to all Pro users", or "enabled by default"]

---

#### [Feature Name]
[Description]

**How to access:** [Location / tier / flag]

---

### ⚡ Improvements

- **[Improvement]:** [What changed and how it's better. E.g. "Export now runs 3x faster for files over 50MB."]
- **[Improvement]:** [Description]
- **[Improvement]:** [Description]

---

### 🐛 Bug Fixes

- Fixed: [Describe the bug that was fixed, not the code that changed. E.g. "Dashboard failed to load for users with more than 500 projects."]
- Fixed: [Description]
- Fixed: [Description]

---

### ⚠️ Deprecations & Breaking Changes

> ⚠️ Action required if you use [X].

- **[API endpoint / feature]** will be removed on **[date]**. Migrate to [new endpoint / feature] by then. [Migration guide link]
- **[Setting / behavior]** has changed. [What the old behavior was and what it is now.]

---

### 🔧 Under the Hood

> *(Optional — include for developer-facing products or internal changelogs)*

- Upgraded [dependency] from [v1] to [v2]
- Migrated [service] to [new infrastructure]
- Reduced p99 API latency from [X]ms to [Y]ms

---

### Known Issues

- [ ] [Issue]: [Description and workaround if available]. Fix expected in [next version / date].

---

### What's Coming Next

> A brief preview of what's in progress — builds anticipation without making commitments.

- [Feature in progress] — [Expected quarter / "coming soon"]
- [Feature in progress] — [Expected quarter]

---

---

## Version [X.Y.Z-1] — [Previous Date]

> **One-line summary:** [Previous release summary]

### ✨ New Features
[...]

### 🐛 Bug Fixes
[...]

---

## Changelog Archive

| Version | Date | Highlights |
|---|---|---|
| [X.Y.Z] | [Date] | [Key change] |
| [X.Y.Z-1] | [Date] | [Key change] |

How to use this Release Notes template

1

Write for users, not engineers

Release notes that describe 'refactored the auth middleware' mean nothing to customers. Translate every change into user impact: 'Login is now 40% faster' instead of 'optimized token validation.'

2

Lead with the most important change

The one-line summary at the top sets expectations. If this release ships one headline feature, say so clearly — don't bury it in a list of 15 bullet points.

3

Call out deprecations prominently

Deprecation warnings must be obvious — use the ⚠️ section with a clear date and migration path. Customers who miss deprecation notices become angry support tickets 3 months later.

4

Keep a living changelog, not just versioned snapshots

The Changelog Archive table at the bottom turns your release notes page into a searchable record of what shipped when. This is invaluable for sales ('when did X ship?'), support, and onboarding new PMs.

Want a Release Notes grounded in your actual customer data?

PMRead ingests your customer interviews, feedback, and Slack threads — and generates PRDs backed by real evidence, not guesses.

Try PMRead free →

Frequently asked questions

How long should release notes be?

As short as the release warrants. A patch with 3 bug fixes needs 3 bullet points. A major release might need 2 pages. The mistake is padding minor releases with filler or compressing major releases into a tweetable summary that leaves users confused.

Should release notes be customer-facing or internal?

Both — but they serve different audiences. Customer-facing notes focus on user benefit, plain language, and 'how to access' guidance. Internal engineering changelogs include technical detail: PRs, infra changes, performance deltas. Use this template for customer-facing; maintain a separate internal CHANGELOG.md for engineering.

Who should write release notes?

The PM should own the customer-facing release notes with input from engineering (for accuracy) and marketing (for tone). Engineers writing raw changelogs is fine for internal use, but customer-facing notes need a PM to translate technical changes into user benefit.

How often should I publish release notes?

At minimum, with every public-facing release. High-frequency shipping teams (weekly or more) often batch notes into a weekly digest. Monthly summaries work well for customers who don't want to track every deployment. Whatever cadence you choose, be consistent — customers notice when the changelog goes quiet.